This episode explores the controversy surrounding Movement Labs' market-making agreement with Web3Port, highlighting the agreement's unusual structure and incentives that led to the CEO's dismissal and industry-wide concerns. Against the backdrop of this scandal, the discussion pivots to the broader implications for market making in crypto, contrasting the Movement Labs deal with standard market-making agreements that include KPIs like uptime and spread, as well as call option structures. More significantly, the panelists debate the prevalence of such shady agreements, especially among tier 2 and 3 exchanges, and the need for greater transparency to protect retail investors. As the discussion pivots to potential solutions, the conversation emphasizes the importance of a disclosure regime for market-making agreements, drawing parallels with IPO disclosures in traditional finance and suggesting that exchanges, VCs, or market makers themselves could drive this change. In contrast to the Movement Labs specific issues, the conversation shifts to the broader FUD around market makers, with Evgeny dispelling the notion that Wintermute and other firms manipulate token prices, attributing this perception to market cycles and a lack of understanding of market structures. Emerging industry patterns reflected in the discussion include a call for self-regulation, the potential for regulatory frameworks from agencies like the SEC or CFTC, and the need for greater consumer confidence in the token listing process.
