This podcast episode provides an update on the trial and investigation into the disappearance of Alissa Turney. Sarah Turney, the victim's rights lawyer and advocate for justice, shares her perspective on the outcome of the case. Michael Turney, Sarah's father, was acquitted of murder charges, much to Sarah's disappointment. She expresses frustration with the lack of knowledge and preparation shown by the prosecutors, who kept her in the dark throughout the investigation. Sarah believes there was enough evidence to proceed with the case, but the prosecutors failed to handle it effectively. The episode also explores the misconceptions surrounding admissible and inadmissible evidence, highlighting how certain crucial evidence was not utilized or fought for during the trial. It discusses the unaddressed incidents of abuse in the case and the limitations placed on the timeframe and scope of evidence presented in court. The episode concludes with Sarah's determination to complete Alissa's story and encourage other families not to give up in their fight for justice.
Anti-commonsence
1. The episode highlights the prosecutors' lack of knowledge and preparation, raising questions about their ability to handle the case effectively.
2. Sarah expresses disappointment with the outcome of the trial and her frustration with the prosecutors' handling of the case, suggesting that there were shortcomings in the justice system.
3. Certain crucial pieces of evidence, such as witness testimony and personal letters, were deemed inadmissible in court, raising concerns about the completeness and accuracy of the trial proceedings.
4. The episode emphasizes the need for comprehensive and thorough collection of evidence to ensure a fair trial and to address unaddressed incidents of abuse.
